Pro-Con Position Paper Grading Rubric – 175 pts
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Length
5.0 pts
Meets length requirement
0.0 pts
Does not meet length requirement
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Point Analysis
30.0 pts
The central idea is develope d and expanded with depth of critical thought.
25.5 pts
The central idea is discer nible and develo ped.
22.5 pts
The central idea needs more developme nt with points tying back to the thesis.
18.0 pts
The central idea is not develope d, and the analysis lacks critical thought.
0.0 pts
No effo rt
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Support
30.0 pts
The writing support s claims with several detailed and persuas ive exampl es. The paper effectiv ely demons trates academ ically credible researc h includin g two peer-re viewed resourc es to support the claims and exampl es.
25.5 pts
The writing support s claims with example s, but addition al analysis or example s could strength en the argume nt. Peer-rev iewed and academi c level resourc es are present, but could be strength ened through number and use to support claims and example s.
22.5 pts
The writing supports claims with examples , but the examples are not well-deve loped or examined . Additiona l examples and analysis are needed to make the argument more persuasiv e. Some quality research is present, but overall effectiven ess and reliability in research and support are not fully demonstr ated.
18.0 pts
The centra l idea is not well-s uppor ted by claims and/or exam ples. Credi bility in resear ch and resour ces has not been well establ ished to suppo rt claims and exam ples.
0.0 pts
No eff ort
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Counterp oint
30.0 pts
The paper effectiv ely introdu ces counte rpoints by establi shing credibi lity of source s and detailin g the eviden ce from the source s and presen ts conces sions of the counte rpoints .
25.5 pts
The paper introdu ces counte rpoints by establi shing credibi lity of source s and detaili ng the eviden ce from the source s and presen ts conces sions of the counte rpoints but may need to strengt hen analysi s.
22.5 pts
The paper introd uces counte rpoint s but may not establi sh credibi lity of source s or detail the eviden ce effecti vely or may not presen t conce ssions .
18.0 pts
The paper does not introdu ce counte rpoints clearly, omittin g the credibi lity of the source s or providi ng little detail of the eviden ce No conces sion is presen t or the conces sion is ineffec tive.
0. 0 pt s
N o eff or t
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Organiza tion
30.0 pts
Paper is clear and cohes ive. Introd uction and concl usion suppo rt the overal l flow of the paper.
25.5 pts
Pape r is basic ally clear and well- orga nized with a mini mum of non-r elate d mate rial prese nt.
22.5 pts
Pape r has some issue s with clarit y, flow, and cohe sion. Pape r lacks orga nizati on.
18.0 pts
Paper lacks organi zation and has difficu lty stayin g on track. Centra l theme s are difficu lt to identif y.
0. 0 pt s
N o ef fo rt
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Revision & Refinem ent
10.0 pts
The writing reflects the feedback received from instructor.
0.0 pts
The writing does not reflect feedback received from instructor.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Writing: Mechani cs & Usage
10. 0 pts
The writ ing is free of maj or err ors in gra mm ar, spe llin g, and pun ctu atio n that wo uld det ract fro m a cle ar rea din g of the pap er.
8.5 pts
The writi ng cont ains a few maj or erro rs in gra mm ar, spel ling, and pun ctua tion, but the erro rs do not detr act from a clea r read ing of the text.
7.5 pts
The writi ng cont ains som e maj or erro rs in gra mm ar, spel ling, and pun ctua tion that nee d to be addr ess ed for a clea rer read ing of the pap er.
6.0 pts
The writ ing con tain s sev eral maj or err ors in gra mm ar, spe llin g, and pun ctu atio n that imp ede a cle ar rea din g of the pap er.
0 . 0 p t s
N o e f f o r t
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Clarity & Flow
10. 0 pts
Th e wri tin g co nta ins str on g wo rd ch oic e tha t cla rifi es ide as an d ma ste rfu l se nte nc e var iet y aid s wit h the
8.5 pts
Th e wri tin g co nta ins va rie d wo rd ch oic e an d se nte nc e str uct ur es tha t cla rif y ide as an d aid wit h the flo w of
7.5 pts
The writ ing con tain s wor d cho ice and sen ten ce str uct ure s that can be revi sed for bett er clar ific atio n of ide as and flo w of ide as.
6.0 pts
The writ ing con tain s wor din g and sen ten ce str uct ure s tha t are aw kw ard and /or unc lear , imp edi ng the clar ity and flo w of ide as.
0 . 0 p t s
N o e f f o r t
10.0 pts
flo w of ide as.
ide as.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Voice
10 .0 pt s
Th e wr iti ng m ai nt ai ns thi rd- pe rs on po int of vi ew /o bj ec tiv e vo ic e thr ou gh ou
8. 5 pt s
Th e wr iti ng m ai nt ai ns thi rd- pe rs on po int of vi ew /o bj ec tiv e vo ic e thr ou gh ou
7. 5 pt s
Th e wr iti ng ha s so m e de vi ati on fro m thi rd- pe rs on po int of vi ew /o bj ec tiv e vo
6. 0 pt s
Th e wr iti ng de vi at es si gn ifi ca ntl y fro m thi rd- pe rs on po int of vi ew /o bj ec tiv e
0 . 0 p t s
N o e f f o r t
10.0 pts
t th e en tir e te xt.
t m uc h of th e te xt.
ic e th at ne ed s to be re vi se d so as no t to so un d bi as ed or pa tro ni zi ng .
vo ic e th at ne ed s to be re vi se d so as no t to so un d bi as ed or pa tro ni zi ng .
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
APA Format
10 .0 pt s
Al l s o ur ce s ar e pr o p er ly in te gr at e d a n d ci te d in th e te xt a n d re fe re n ce s
8. 5 pt s
M o st s o ur ce s ar e in te gr at e d a n d ci te d in th e te xt a n d re fe re n ce s p a g e.
7 . 5 p t s
M o s t s o u r c e s a r e i n t e g r a t e d a n d c it e d i n t h e t e
6. 0 pt s
S ou rc es ar e no t pr op erl y int eg ra te d/ cit ed in th e te xt/ re fe re nc es pa ge . Fo r m att in g co nt
0 . 0 p t s
N o e f f o r t
10.0 pts
p a g e d e m o n st ra ti n g a m as te ry of in te gr at in g re s o ur ce s a n d A P A fo r m at .
S o m e m in or er ro rs m ay ex is t in in te gr at io n a n d/ or ci ta ti o n, b ut it d o es n ot in te rf er e wi th u
x t a n d r e f e r e n c e s p a g e . S o m e e r r o r s m a y e x i s t i n i n t e g r a
ai ns se ve ral er ro rs th at su gg es t a la ck of un de rs ta nd in g of th e int eg ra tio n of re so ur ce s an d A P A fo r
n d er st a n di n g th e s o ur ce of th e in fo r m at io n.
ti o n a n d / o r c it a ti o n t h a t n e e d t o b e a d d r e s s e d t o c l a ri f y t h e
m at.
s o u r c e o f i n f o r m a ti o n .
Total Points: 175.0
Previous?Next
https://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/60471/modules/items/7734277
https://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/60471/modules/items/7734281
Applied Sciences
Architecture and Design
Biology
Business & Finance
Chemistry
Computer Science
Geography
Geology
Education
Engineering
English
Environmental science
Spanish
Government
History
Human Resource Management
Information Systems
Law
Literature
Mathematics
Nursing
Physics
Political Science
Psychology
Reading
Science
Social Science
Liberty University
New Hampshire University
Strayer University
University Of Phoenix
Walden University
Home
Homework Answers
Blog
Archive
Tags
Reviews
Contact
twitterfacebook
Copyright © 2022 SweetStudy.comSWEETSTUDY.COM YOUR HOMEWORK ANSWERS
chat0
Home.Literature.
Help.
Log in / Sign up
Pro-Con Position paper
profile
Kali23
Untitleddocument25.pdf
Home>Nursing homework help>Pro-Con Position paper
Pro-Con Position Paper Grading Rubric – 175 pts
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Length
5.0 pts
Meets length requirement
0.0 pts
Does not meet length requirement
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Point Analysis
30.0 pts
The central idea is develope d and expanded with depth of critical thought.
25.5 pts
The central idea is discer nible and develo ped.
22.5 pts
The central idea needs more developme nt with points tying back to the thesis.
18.0 pts
The central idea is not develope d, and the analysis lacks critical thought.
0.0 pts
No effo rt
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Support
30.0 pts
The writing support s claims with several detailed and persuas ive exampl es. The paper effectiv ely demons trates academ ically credible researc h includin g two peer-re viewed resourc es to support the claims and exampl es.
25.5 pts
The writing support s claims with example s, but addition al analysis or example s could strength en the argume nt. Peer-rev iewed and academi c level resourc es are present, but could be strength ened through number and use to support claims and example s.
22.5 pts
The writing supports claims with examples , but the examples are not well-deve loped or examined . Additiona l examples and analysis are needed to make the argument more persuasiv e. Some quality research is present, but overall effectiven ess and reliability in research and support are not fully demonstr ated.
18.0 pts
The centra l idea is not well-s uppor ted by claims and/or exam ples. Credi bility in resear ch and resour ces has not been well establ ished to suppo rt claims and exam ples.
0.0 pts
No eff ort
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Counterp oint
30.0 pts
The paper effectiv ely introdu ces counte rpoints by establi shing credibi lity of source s and detailin g the eviden ce from the source s and presen ts conces sions of the counte rpoints .
25.5 pts
The paper introdu ces counte rpoints by establi shing credibi lity of source s and detaili ng the eviden ce from the source s and presen ts conces sions of the counte rpoints but may need to strengt hen analysi s.
22.5 pts
The paper introd uces counte rpoint s but may not establi sh credibi lity of source s or detail the eviden ce effecti vely or may not presen t conce ssions .
18.0 pts
The paper does not introdu ce counte rpoints clearly, omittin g the credibi lity of the source s or providi ng little detail of the eviden ce No conces sion is presen t or the conces sion is ineffec tive.
0. 0 pt s
N o eff or t
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Organiza tion
30.0 pts
Paper is clear and cohes ive. Introd uction and concl usion suppo rt the overal l flow of the paper.
25.5 pts
Pape r is basic ally clear and well- orga nized with a mini mum of non-r elate d mate rial prese nt.
22.5 pts
Pape r has some issue s with clarit y, flow, and cohe sion. Pape r lacks orga nizati on.
18.0 pts
Paper lacks organi zation and has difficu lty stayin g on track. Centra l theme s are difficu lt to identif y.
0. 0 pt s
N o ef fo rt
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Revision & Refinem ent
10.0 pts
The writing reflects the feedback received from instructor.
0.0 pts
The writing does not reflect feedback received from instructor.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Writing: Mechani cs & Usage
10. 0 pts
The writ ing is free of maj or err ors in gra mm ar, spe llin g, and pun ctu atio n that wo uld det ract fro m a cle ar rea din g of the pap er.
8.5 pts
The writi ng cont ains a few maj or erro rs in gra mm ar, spel ling, and pun ctua tion, but the erro rs do not detr act from a clea r read ing of the text.
7.5 pts
The writi ng cont ains som e maj or erro rs in gra mm ar, spel ling, and pun ctua tion that nee d to be addr ess ed for a clea rer read ing of the pap er.
6.0 pts
The writ ing con tain s sev eral maj or err ors in gra mm ar, spe llin g, and pun ctu atio n that imp ede a cle ar rea din g of the pap er.
0 . 0 p t s
N o e f f o r t
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Clarity & Flow
10. 0 pts
Th e wri tin g co nta ins str on g wo rd ch oic e tha t cla rifi es ide as an d ma ste rfu l se nte nc e var iet y aid s wit h the
8.5 pts
Th e wri tin g co nta ins va rie d wo rd ch oic e an d se nte nc e str uct ur es tha t cla rif y ide as an d aid wit h the flo w of
7.5 pts
The writ ing con tain s wor d cho ice and sen ten ce str uct ure s that can be revi sed for bett er clar ific atio n of ide as and flo w of ide as.
6.0 pts
The writ ing con tain s wor din g and sen ten ce str uct ure s tha t are aw kw ard and /or unc lear , imp edi ng the clar ity and flo w of ide as.
0 . 0 p t s
N o e f f o r t
10.0 pts
flo w of ide as.
ide as.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Voice
10 .0 pt s
Th e wr iti ng m ai nt ai ns thi rd- pe rs on po int of vi ew /o bj ec tiv e vo ic e thr ou gh ou
8. 5 pt s
Th e wr iti ng m ai nt ai ns thi rd- pe rs on po int of vi ew /o bj ec tiv e vo ic e thr ou gh ou
7. 5 pt s
Th e wr iti ng ha s so m e de vi ati on fro m thi rd- pe rs on po int of vi ew /o bj ec tiv e vo
6. 0 pt s
Th e wr iti ng de vi at es si gn ifi ca ntl y fro m thi rd- pe rs on po int of vi ew /o bj ec tiv e
0 . 0 p t s
N o e f f o r t
10.0 pts
t th e en tir e te xt.
t m uc h of th e te xt.
ic e th at ne ed s to be re vi se d so as no t to so un d bi as ed or pa tro ni zi ng .
vo ic e th at ne ed s to be re vi se d so as no t to so un d bi as ed or pa tro ni zi ng .
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
APA Format
10 .0 pt s
Al l s o ur ce s ar e pr o p er ly in te gr at e d a n d ci te d in th e te xt a n d re fe re n ce s
8. 5 pt s
M o st s o ur ce s ar e in te gr at e d a n d ci te d in th e te xt a n d re fe re n ce s p a g e.
7 . 5 p t s
M o s t s o u r c e s a r e i n t e g r a t e d a n d c it e d i n t h e t e
6. 0 pt s
S ou rc es ar e no t pr op erl y int eg ra te d/ cit ed in th e te xt/ re fe re nc es pa ge . Fo r m att in g co nt
0 . 0 p t s
N o e f f o r t
10.0 pts
p a g e d e m o n st ra ti n g a m as te ry of in te gr at in g re s o ur ce s a n d A P A fo r m at .
S o m e m in or er ro rs m ay ex is t in in te gr at io n a n d/ or ci ta ti o n, b ut it d o es n ot in te rf er e wi th u
x t a n d r e f e r e n c e s p a g e . S o m e e r r o r s m a y e x i s t i n i n t e g r a
ai ns se ve ral er ro rs th at su gg es t a la ck of un de rs ta nd in g of th e int eg ra tio n of re so ur ce s an d A P A fo r
n d er st a n di n g th e s o ur ce of th e in fo r m at io n.
ti o n a n d / o r c it a ti o n t h a t n e e d t o b e a d d r e s s e d t o c l a ri f y t h e
m at.
s o u r c e o f i n f o r m a ti o n .
Total Points: 175.0
Previous?Next
https://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/60471/modules/items/7734277
https://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/60471/modules/items/7734281
Applied Sciences
Architecture and Design
Biology
Business & Finance
Chemistry
Computer Science
Geography
Geology
Education
Engineering
English
Environmental science
Spanish
Government
History
Human Resource Management
Information Systems
Law
Literature
Mathematics
Nursing
Physics
Political Science
Psychology
Reading
Science
Social Science
Liberty University
New Hampshire University
Strayer University
University Of Phoenix
Walden University
Home
Homework Answers
Blog
Archive
Tags
Reviews
Contact
twitterfacebook
Copyright © 2022 SweetStudy.com
